The mechanics work well enough, but they're put into the game so poorly that it boggles my mind. James: The gameplay ranges from passable to abominable.
And if you die, you have to repeat everything over again. See what I did there? Imagine that instead of two repeating sentences, there are generic repeating dungeon floors with the same stupid enemies constantly re-appearing, and you attack them with generic attacks over and over again. Its intense repetition doesn’t make the game as kid-friendly as Chunsoft might think it is. The actual dungeon-crawling brings some challenge to the table and its intense repetition doesn’t make the game as kid-friendly as Chunsoft might think it is. You then choose a partner out of a reduced amount of Pokémon. Every starter creature from the main series is included, and other famous Pokémon such as Pikachu and Meowth are in there as well. It begins with you answering a series of questions to decide what kind of Pokémon you are from a set of sixteen different Pokémon. Neal: The game is, at heart, a kid-friendly version of the Mystery Dungeon dungeon-crawling series.
I avoided discussion of the first Pokémon Mystery Dungeon, in order to stay "pure." I understood it was a random dungeon affair, and that I should be ready for that kind of stuff.
My first course of action was to look at the history of the Mystery Dungeon series. James Jones: I had actually kept up with the Pokémon series, perhaps a bit more than I would care to admit. So when the second DS outing of Chunsoft’s Pokémon Mystery Dungeon series rolled around, my interest was piqued. In an effort to procrastinate from my studies, I bought Pokémon Pearl and got involved in the wild world of monster collecting once more. However, once I got older, I moved away from the Pokémon limelight, or at least I did until the release of last year’s Pokémon Diamond/Pearl. Neal Ronaghan: When Pokémon first hit the world, I was a huge pre-teen fan.
0 kommentar(er)
